On the Internet you can find and all information concerning "chemtrails" are varied, but the parties seem always and only 2.
when we approached this problem we have found a "conflict" between the so-called "sciachimisti / conspiracy" and "disinformation / debunkers" ... each fielded by his party believes to be right and you came out from this pattern.
this thing has made us think a little bit and we have begun to follow, day after day, the various developments of this "fight" we have come to virtual and the probable explanation of this "apparent" randomness.
first of all we realized that the so-called "sciachimisti" do not like to call it, this word in fact, includes all the likely argument toghether all, including even the most extravagant and foolish argument.
the other hand we have the misinformation but do not divide, but remain in a single category and are happy to be.
in a game is understandable that these parties are exchanging heavy teasing or jokes, but if we analyze the reasons for both, we note that there is something wrong.
the motivations that lead an ordinary citizen to ask what are those squares in the sky, forming a white film, are plausible and acceptable if they think this thing hurts, do well to ask, to seek and disseminate information about what have seen. that which is not understandable is the fury and intensity of response from the deniers, those who believe in chemtrails. when you do not believe a theory or a hoax, so they love to call it, do not waste all your time to create blog against the so-called sciachimisti, copy the speeches to find personal nit to constantly change the information on wikipedia to only pass the conspiracy theory world ipergalattico to personally denigrate those who speak of this problem and to attack the few scientists who talk about it ... etc.
if you believe that this is not a problem let it go.
but so is not, and seem to be more activists those who do not believe that the other ...
NOT 'WHAT A VERY CRAZY, AND UNEXPLAINED STRANGE??
short, I do not think the argument that "flying donkeys" I do not waste time saying that donkeys do not fly, I do not blog to denigrate those who say so ... I do not care and just let them talk, if it is a hoax will pay the consequences in the image more.
this "aggressive" could be explained in two ways:
1) the problem of the trails there and anywhere there are people who try to belittle the problem because paid
2) many people believe in good faith to the words of disinformation / Deniers and make it a personal matter (like "let's see who the spring before")
in both cases this behavior of the debunkers, is highly ambiguous and dubious people in , leads to further curiosity and, above all, reinforces the idea that there is something wrong! Another particular "strange" is that a lot of misinformation bulls follow step by step all those who speak of trails, as if they had become essential "rubbish" that view, otherwise end of the world. On the contrary, those who believe that contrails are really a problem, she follows those that do not and will not mark everything that people say ... maximum you keep up to date on what happens in our skies or acquisition of visual data. Returning to
de bunker, we can see that these go far beyond, in fact use the theories more "crazy and ambiguous" of some sciachimisti, as proof that the trails do not exist!?. If tomorrow AICA talk of UFOs, we would have a number of bulls misinforms has prepared us a great advertising ... who would themselves linklerebbero our theories everywhere just to denigrate ... And so already the case with many blogs or websites that appear against the wakes ... 'cause this behavior?
not speak for their counter- and advertise it?
the explanation that we have set ourselves is that, most likely, these theories outside the norms of science, cause who wants to divorce and to inform the masses.
into believing that all say the same things, from the bunker, throw in the "racket" and that makes sense everything is based on science fiction and paranoia or at least humor ... Basically if a wrong word, all are branded by "ignorant" and are teased, This is an incorrect behavior that demonstrates the bad faith of those who do so.
CONCLUSIONS: misinforms between bulls / de bunker and sciachimisti / complottsisti there are plenty of middle ground, so it is wrong to bring it up against and in favor and do a whole apples and oranges, who does so in bad faith and has a second purpose, do not be fooled and get over it ... JUST
WE DEMAND THE TRUTH ...
you can not believe our doubts and remain skeptical But at least ask yourself questions and see if there's something strange ... you'll notice it too.
RENEWING THE CALLS ON THE NATIONAL EXHIBITION OF 20 NOVEMBER TO ROME, Piazza Santi Apostoli 14:00 ... ORGANISED BY IVANA MANNINO chemtrail ... HAARP. WE WAIT ... DO NOT MISS IT!
0 comments:
Post a Comment